06C8B277-0294-4DD3-87E7-2E5F06064F31.jpeg

57A4B006-DB51-4D2D-AD9C-9FD5290B1FBF.jpeg

Choice of topic Choice of methods
Theoretical (nature of social world) • Intended audience Burawoy
• Purpose of research, hypothesis or describe
• Researcher’s values on funding • positivists=causality
• interactionists=descriptive
Practicals • Money: Who pay for it, eg policy-makers
• Access: to research subjects, eg Goffman denied, or eg research on poor people • Nature of the topic being studied, eg if study social facts like suidice
• Size and structure of the sampling frame, eg survey for dispersed groups
Ethical Deception? cMorally ambiguous, eg Milgram electric shocks

3DFA7568-01C8-4D11-BD99-CED23A0924A1.jpeg

Strength and weakness of

Intro: define method, what data, what perspective

Paragraphs

1 practical TRAMP (TimeResercherbiasAcessMoneyPersonlacharacteristics)

2 ethical DRIPS (Deception Righttowithdraw Informedconsent Protectionftonpsycholohicalharm Situationalethics)

3 Reliability vs Validity debate

4 Enough vs Representativeness (no method is representativeness or collects enough methods, thus should use triangulation)